We're Open
+44 7340 9595 39
+44 20 3239 6980

John Jameson case Analysis

  100% Pass and No Plagiarism Guaranteed

John Jameson case Analysis

Adopting a budgetary performance evaluation as a way of rewarding the most performing employees in organization can lead to employees adopting unethical techniques that will qualify them for the reward as it is in the case of John Jameson. The actions of John Jameson, plant managers and sales supervisors to accounting for the previous year’s sales in the current year and accounting for the purchases of this year in the past year raises various ethical implications. It is unethical for them of the company to manipulate the financial report for personal gains. Ethically, the manager is supposed to give the financial report that reflects the operations of the company for a given period of time in a transparent, fair, and truthful way (Arora & Katyal, 2009). When observation corporate ethics, the management is supposed to ensure that they have subordinated their personal interest to that of the organization. As such, the actions by John and his subordinates to manipulate the financial report to meet the personal interests is unethical.

The subordinates, plant managers and sales supervisors are supposed to report the unethical practices of their manager to the senior management of the company, otherwise, by implementing John’s request regardless of them being unacceptable makes them unethical. Ethics require them to report any information that they are aware of which is not in the interest of the company. The actions of manipulating sales, budgetary estimates, and material purchases by John, plant manager and the sales supervisors dent the reliability of the regional financial reporting. It has a negative impact on regional cost behaviors as it promotes over estimation of expenses, and underestimation of sales. This makes it difficult for the parent company to estimate the expected performance from the region accurately. The budgetary estimates by John Jameson as a regional manager cannot be relied upon to make important decisions such as investment, and other strategic decisions (Duska, Duska & Ragatz, 2011). The master budget of the organization does not reflect the true estimate………………………..


100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

View our samples written by our professional writers to let you comprehend how your work is going to look like. We have categorised this into 3 categories with a few different subject domains

View Our Samples

We offer a £ 2999

If your assignment is plagiarised, we will give you £ 2999 in compensation

Recent Updates

Details

  • Title: John Jameson case Analysis
  • Price: £ 99
  • Post Date: 2021-04-19T10:29:11+00:00
  • Category: Research Paper Queries
  • No Plagiarism Guarantee
  • 100% Custom Written

Customer Reviews

John Jameson case Analysis John Jameson case Analysis
Reviews: 5

A masterpiece of assignment by , written on 2020-03-12

Oh my god! This writing company has saved me from so many bothering and figured out my problem in the best way possible. I am not fond of reading and when this book review was given to me as part of my coursework, I went into depression. But I must say, my writer came up with an amazing book review covering all the major aspects of the book nicely. I am waiting for other assignments to come so that I would come here again. The place is good and quite reasonable as well which makes it easy for me to manage my budget.
Reviews: 5

A masterpiece of assignment by , written on 2020-03-12

This is my second order which I booked recently at Insta Research. I just got my coursework completed expertly. Just waiting for good scores now.