100% Pass and No Plagiarism Guaranteed

[Solved] Monroe Doctrine

Table of Contents Introduction Concept of Monroe Doctrine Roosevelt Corollary Arguments on Monroe Doctrine Personal Opinion Conclusion References Introduction Monroe Doctrine is the policy that was developed by President James Monroe which focused on the aspect that any sort of interference done by external power in the political features of America will be considered as a hostile act against the United States. This policy emphasized on three aspects that are colonization, intervention, and interference. Monroe Doctrine is considered as the most important policy in the US because it helped them in supporting their policies from the impact of European power. They issued this policy in order to make sure that European power does not move in the United States. The concept of colonization is discussed in this paper by considering perspective of different authors. The arguments are presented with proper evidence and support from published data. The most imperative issue that found in Monroe doctrine is that it totally opposed the idea of colonialism that might be discouraging for those countries which are willing to take assistance from other developed countries in order to improve their economic position viably

Concept of Monroe Doctrine

According to Livingstone (2009), this policy was written in response to the conflicts that were taking place in the United States in regard to foreign relations with Russia and Spain. It is noticed that colonies of Spain declared their independence. While on the other hand, Russia was continuously making efforts to gain control in the Northwestern area of the North America. This was the major reason that resulted in the arrival of Monroe Doctrine. Bucheli (2008) further stated that three main concepts are discussed in this doctrine which included non-colonization, non-intervention and separating spheres of influence for the Europe and America.  These were designed in order to highlight the break between the America and the autocratic realm of Europe. Moreover, with the help of this doctrine, the imperial European powers were warned against the powers of Europe that interfered in the affairs of the United States. Along with the objection for the European colonies in the US, they also focused on increasing the influence and trading ties with the country all over the region. The greatest hurdle towards this was an economic expansion which was highlighted by the mercantilism in Europe. The greatest fear of Americans was that France and Spain might reaffirm colonialism on them.

Roosevelt Corollary

John Quincy Adams the author of doctrine stated it as a proclamation by the United States in relation to ethical obstruction to colonialism.  However, this concept was reinterpreted by the President named Theodore Roosevelt. Mariano (2011)stated that Roosevelt Corollary resulted as the important alternation in Monroe Doctrine as it enforced on the right of the United States to interfere to alleviate the economic affairs of small nations that were present in Caribbean and Central America. This assistance was provided to these nations at the time they became unable to pay their loans. The proposed alternative was an intervention that was initiated by European powers such as Germany and Britain that loaned money to the nations that did not repay. This was the main concept of the intervention proposed by Roosevelt that helped small nations in getting finance. Hence, based on this, it is noticed that this alternative proved to be best for the smaller nations as they received finance from stronger nations.

Arguments on Monroe Doctrine

It is noted that Monroe Doctrine is considered as one of the most profitable resources for the USA amid his administration would be the self-titled Monroe Doctrine. Moreover, this address put forward an American composed approach on European mediation in the Western Hemisphere, and would soon get to be one of the establishments of United States arrangement in Latin America. However, the president James Monroe made this affirmation in his seventh yearly deliver to the congress of the United States on December 2, 1823. It is noted that initially only an announcement of arrangement, on the grounds that it was not upheld by congressional enactment or made strong in international law, yet in the long run it turned into the cornerstone rule in the United States foreign strategy, to be utilized by future presidents as a part of other outside battles. Furthermore, the Monroe regulation was produced in light of the fact that the United States and Britain were concerned over the likelihood of European colonial expansion in Latin America, and South America. In addition, Britain concern was brought on by the fear that Spain would endeavor to recover its previous settlements, which had as of late picked up autonomy. This stressed them in light of the fact that it would make their exchange with these new countries definitely decrease (Gilderhus, 2006; Bingham, 2011).

According to Stepak and Whitlark (2012), the United States fundamental concern was to guarantee that no European countries would endeavor further colonization in the Western Hemisphere. Moreover, at that time G. Canning, the British foreign minister, proposed a joint endeavor with the United States in which both countries intrigues would be protected. However John.Q.Adams, the secretary of state, was stressed over the United States resembling a cockboat in the wake of a British man-o-war. Therefore, he persuaded President Monroe to build up the United States own strategy, which would ensure U.S. intrigues that were free of Britain. Furthermore, the Monroe Doctrine insisted the two primary arrangements of non-colonization and non-intervention. These outstanding statements affirmed that European countries could no more colonize the American mainland and that they ought not to meddle with the recently free Spanish American republics. Monroe particularly cautioned European powers against endeavoring to force government on free American countries yet included that the United States would not meddle in existing European settlements or in Europe itself. These two thoughts are not new, nor are they unique.

Taylor (2012) stated that the doctrine additionally stayed dependable to President Washington s farewell location of 1796, in which he encouraged the United States to stray from catching unions. This, nonetheless, was not illustrative of an independent arrangement. However, by isolating Europe from American countries, Monroe was attempting to safeguard the presence of particular Western Hemisphere, and particularly the United States intrigues. In addition, Monroe s thoughts were enormous forward looking. Moreover, he restricted the European political arrangement of government trusting that no American country ought to receive it and felt that its vicinity anyplace in the Western Hemisphere imperiled the peace and security of the still youthful the United States. He likewise trusted that the United States, alone, ought to finish the colonization of North America. On the other hand, in spite of his solid attestations Monroe did not propose any way to guarantee completion of them. Bingham (2011) stated that the United States couldn`t guarantee this approach alone, however, Monroe knew this, and aroused for Britain s support and Grandin (2012) was effective on the grounds that Britain additionally contradicted European mediation in Spain s endeavor to restore its colonies.

It is noted that the Monroe Doctrine was a foundation in American History in view of the conclusion of the Western Hemisphere for future colonization, sees that any endeavors at controlling the Western Hemisphere were antagonistic, and avoidance of the United States from meddling in inner issues and the wars of European forces. However, the Monroe Doctrine was produced in light of the fact that the United States has agonized over the European frontier development in Latin America and South America. On the other hand, England`s worries were brought on by Spain`s endeavor to recover its previous states that had picked up their freedom. This was a worry on the grounds that it would bring about their exchanging with new countries to decay. The United States didn`t need any more European impact in the Western Hemisphere. For that reason, the Monroe Doctrine expanded America`s craving for self-safeguarding, into an order for development first into Latin America, and in the end the world over. This made the United States the main intense country in the Western Hemisphere and left the Europeans to battle among them in Europe (Murphy, 2005; Renehan, 2007).

It is found that the Monroe Doctrine`s assurance over the whole Western Hemisphere protected the enthusiasm of the United States. President Monroe trusted that the United States alone ought to finish the colonization of North America. The general population of the United States detracted an extraordinary enthusiasm for breaking from European principle. The first purpose of the Monroe Doctrine was to ensure American standards and to keep antagonistic powers far from our outskirts. Numerous Americans felt that there ought to be sufficient area for each American citizen. In addition, the United States would need to get more land keeping in mind the end goal to get this going. In spite of the fact that his framework was favored in a significant part of the Western Hemisphere, there was a restriction to it in the Eastern Hemisphere. The three driving outright governments of Europe were Russia, Austria, and other countries (Grandin, 2012; Stepak & Whitlark, 2012).

According to Gilderhus (2006) not merely did the statesmen of the United States fear the expansion of European colonization, yet they saw with profound concern the likelihood of the exchange of American domain starting with one European control then onto the next, or the exchange of such region from an American to a non-American power. Furthermore, in earlier eighteenth century the congress of the United States passed a determination as to East Florida, expressing that "considering the impact which the fate of the region adjoining the southern fringe of the United States may have upon their security, serenity, and business," the United States might be unable, "without genuine inquietude, see any piece of the said domain go under the control of any outside force." It is noticed that the deceleration in the messages of President Polk in mid eighteenth century was so intently connected with the doctrine reported by Monroe that they may be regarded to fall inside of the same representing guideline. With reference to the instance of Yucatan, when the powers of the nation offered to exchange the territory and sway to the United States and in the meantime made a comparable offer to Great Britain and Spain.

However, according to President Polk said: it is not my motivation to suggest the appropriation of any measure, with a perspective to the obtaining of the `domain and sway` over Yucatan, yet, as indicated by their set up arrangement, they couldn`t agree to an exchange of this `territory and power` to Spain, Great Britain, or some other European power. Furthermore, the President Polk`s reference to the exchange of domain and sway obviously implied resistance to the securing of regional control by any methods and this position has every now and again been emphasized by the Government of the United States (Livingstone, 2009; Bingham, 2011).

It is noticed that the Monroe Doctrine was an establishment in American History in perspective of the finish of the Western Hemisphere for future colonization, sees that any tries at controlling the Western Hemisphere were antagonistic, and evasion of the United States from interfering in inside issues and the wars of European powers. Furthermore, the Monroe Doctrine was made in light of the way that the United States was pushed over the European wilderness improvement in Latin America and South America. On the other hand, Britain`s stresses were conveyed over by Spain`s try to recuperate its past states that had gotten their self-rule. This was a stress in light of the way that it would realize their trading with new nations to decay. Moreover, the United States didn`t require any more European effect in the Western Hemisphere. The Monroe Doctrine added to America`s desire for self-defending, into a charge for augmentation first into Latin America, and over the long haul the world over. This made the United States the primary extreme nation in the Western Hemisphere and left the Europeans to fight among them in Europe (Stepak & Whitlark, 2012; Grandin, 2012).

It is found that in earlier nineteenth century the Senate of the United States received a determination, obviously having quick reference to Magdalena inlet, that when any harbor or another spot in the American mainland’s is situated to the point that the occupation thereof for maritime or military purposes may debilitate the interchanges or the security of the United States, the Government of the United States couldn`t see without grave concern the ownership of such harbor or other spot by any partnership or affiliation which has such a connection to another Government, not American, as to give that Government down to earth power or control for maritime or military purposes. It was clarified in the backing of the determination that it laid on the rule of self-protection and that it was "unified to the Monroe Doctrine, obviously, yet not as a matter of course ward upon it or becoming out of it.” Since the assertion of Monroe, the acclaimed Doctrine has been adjusted in just two particulars (Mariano, 2011; Bingham, 2011).

Information disclosed with Europe solely in perspective, must be considered material to all non-American powers; and the resistance to the expansion of colonization was not subordinate upon the specific strategy for securing regional control, and, in any event since Polk`s time, may be esteemed to grasp restriction to obtaining of extra region through exchange of territory or sway. Neither of these adjustments changes the precept in its essentials and it might in this manner be compressed as being contradicted (1) to any non-American activity infringing upon the political freedom of American States under any appearance, and (2) to the obtaining in any way of the control of extra domain on the western side of the equator by any non-American power (Renehan, 2007; Stepak & Whitlark, 2012).

Personal Opinion

In My opinion, the concept of Monroe Doctrine was beneficial for the United States because it considered the efforts of European nations to interfere with the states in South and North America as the act of aggression. Moreover, it also emphasized on releasing the newly independent colonies from the intervention of Europe. With the help of this policy, the situation of development of New World as a battleground was controlled to utmost level. In addition to this, this doctrine is also considered as effective by me because it stated that the old and new worlds are different and separate spheres of influence because all then nations in there are independent and separate.  Therefore, I would state that Monroe Doctrine was the good act that was adopted by the officials of the United States to secure the nation from European influence.  

Conclusion

It is concluded that Monroe Doctrine is against the concept of colonization and stated that there must be no European colonies.  With the help of this policy, the United States of America highlighted the fact that they did not want any sort of interference from external powers in the manner of the nation. It is noticed from the arguments provided that Monroe Doctrine is considered as the significant resource for USA. Moreover, the main focus of the United States was in the aspect that no European countries have the power to endeavor further colonization in the Western Hemisphere. It focused on eliminating the factor of colonization in North America. Hence, the concept of non-colonization in the United States is discussed in this paper in the light of arguments of different scholars