We write, we don’t plagiarise! Every answer is different no matter how many orders we get for the same assignment. Your answer will be 100% plagiarism-free, custom written, unique and different from every other student.
I agree to receive phone calls from you at night in case of emergency
Please share your assignment brief and supporting material (if any) via email here at: [email protected] after completing this order process.
No Plagiarism Guarantee - 100% Custom Written
LLB Criminal Law
Module Code: LW40048E
Level 4
Credits 30
SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT 2
Weighting: 40%
TASK 1.
Write a note of the case of R v Gurpinar; Kojo-Smith (2015), to include:-
- The names and references of the various Law Reports in which you found the case(s);
- The names of the courts in which the case(s) was/were heard at each stage of the proceedings;
- The names of the judges who heard the case(s) at the highest court;
- A précis of the facts;
- A précis of the highest court’s decision;
- The highest court’s reasoning for the decision (ratio decidendi);
TASK 2.
On completing the first task, state your opinion of the decision of the highest court. Critically appraise the Court`s decision to decline to provide further guidance to clarify the uncertainty as to the definition of `loss of self-control`.
TASK 3.
Review and discuss academic commentaries on the case in various law journals. Has the case been critically appraised by any academic authors? Do you agree or disagree with such critical appraisals?
