We're Open
+44 7340 9595 39
+44 20 3239 6980

WORK DESIGN PILOT AT CERA

  100% Pass and No Plagiarism Guaranteed

WORK DESIGN PILOT AT CERA

Option 1- Work design pilot at CERA (Topic 2)
Refer to the story of CERA relating to work design in Topic 2. Using the information in the topic and at least 10 additional sources, provide advice to Rachel Amaro on how to design jobs in her area to support innovative behaviour. At least five of the additional sources must be academic journals or books/book chapters published in the last ten years.
 

Option 2 - The business rationale for diversity management (Topic 3)
Study the business rationale for diversity management and the debates surrounding this using the information in Topic 3, and at least 10 additional sources. At least five of the additional sources must be academic journals or books/book chapters published in the last ten years.
Then, answer this question.
Are you convinced by the business rationale argument for diversity management? What argument would you make to Mark French regarding the business case for focusing on diversity management in CERA? 
 

Option 3 - Options for performance measurement in CERA (Topic 4)
Consider the story of CERA as it relates to individual performance measurement in Topic 4 (note that this does not include the operation of the bonus scheme). Then, answer these two questions, using the information in Topic 4 and at least 10 additional sources. At least five of the additional sources must be academic journals or books/book chapters published in the last ten years.
1. What limitations are evident in CERA’s individual performance measurement, taking into account its organisational strategy and recent developments in this HRM practice as reported in professional literature provided in Topic 4?
2. Recommend two alternative measurement approaches and indicative methods within each approach that you believe could work in CERA to address the limitations. 
 

 

Rationale

This assessment task will enable you to demonstrate your achievement of the following learning outcomes in the subject:
• be able to critically analyse and assess recent literature on human resource management, and debate the issues raised;
• be able to explain how human resource management initiatives assist stakeholders within organisations to respond to changing workplace environments;
• be able to discuss, explain and analyse the relationship between organisational strategy and human resource strategies.

 

Marking criteria

Marking guide for Assessment 2

 

Criterion and weighting

High distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Fail

Critical analysis and assessment of relevant literature in the development of an argument (45 marks)

Demonstrates critical reading ability in reviewing recent literature.

Constructs an evidence-based argument, drawing on academic and professional sources.

Uses the literature to develop the student’s own voice in constructing an argument.

Demonstrates critical reading ability, the ability to construct an evidence-based argument and the exercise of independent judgment.  There are gaps in critical evaluation of claims and in the use of the literature to develop the student’s own voice.

 

There is an imbalance between description and critical evaluation of the literature.

This leads to an argument that is driven more by authors’ claims.

The discussion demonstrates an attempt to exercise critical, independent judgment; however, it tends to be overly descriptive of the literature.

Thus, the argument consists largely of an organised set of claims made by authors.

Largely descriptive, lacking independent critical evaluation of claims. The line of argument is difficult to find.

Referencing (8 marks)

(Minimum referencing requirement: ten sources, including five academic sources from the last ten years.)

Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms exactly to APA style conventions.

 

Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms to APA style conventions with fewer than three minor errors or omissions which don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.

 

Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to APA style conventions. Up to eight minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, underlining) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.

 

Referencing is comprehensive and mostly accurate according to APA style conventions. Frequent minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, underlining) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or the demonstration of academic integrity.

Fails to meet criteria for a pass. (

Report writing technique

(7 marks)

The report is formatted correctly. It is written using appropriate language and style. A coherent argument is built, with each point building on the previous one. Each part of argument is connected to the question.

Minor errors in report format. The writing style and language are appropriate for a report.

There are minor errors in coherence of the argument and in connections made to the question. It is thus unclear at times why some parts of the argument have been provided.

The report is formatted according to business report conventions, but with some errors in format. The language and writing style are not always appropriate to a report genre. There may be gaps in coherence of the argument, making it difficult to follow.

 

 

The report is on the right track, but needs significant improvement in format and/or writing style and/or coherence.

Poor formatting, written expression and/or coherence.

 


100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

View our samples written by our professional writers to let you comprehend how your work is going to look like. We have categorised this into 3 categories with a few different subject domains

View Our Samples

We offer a £ 2999

If your assignment is plagiarised, we will give you £ 2999 in compensation

Recent Updates

Details

  • Title: WORK DESIGN PILOT AT CERA
  • Price: £ 109
  • Post Date: 2020-04-15T14:46:27+00:00
  • Category: Assignment Queries
  • No Plagiarism Guarantee
  • 100% Custom Written

Customer Reviews

WORK DESIGN PILOT AT CERA WORK DESIGN PILOT AT CERA
Reviews: 5

A masterpiece of assignment by , written on 2020-03-12

I had wasted so much money for poor quality work on other sites that I became despair to find a reliable one. I landed on Insta Research and finally, I am fully satisfied after ages from their quality of the work and instant response. Also, the rates are handy. Great going guys!
Reviews: 5

A masterpiece of assignment by , written on 2020-03-12

I was worried about the plagiarism ration in my dissertation. But thanks to my dedicated writer, I received 0% plagiarism in all the chapters. I owe my writer a million thanks..!