We're Open
+44 7340 9595 39
+44 20 3239 6980

Why was the study conducted, or why was the paper written?

Information



  • Post Date 2018-11-07T11:51:32+00:00
  • Post Category New Samples

No Plagiarism Guarantee - 100% Custom Written

Order Details

Why was the study conducted, or why was the paper written?

Sex Diferences in Humen mate Preferences

INSTRUCTIONS:
The following points must be included in the critique summary: 1. Why was the study conducted, or why was the paper written? What gaps in knowledge or understanding was it intended to fill? 2. What hypotheses were tasted or what research was reviewed? 3. What are the results or conclusions? 4. Who do the results or conclusions shed light on broader issues? 5. What questions did the paper raised for you? 6. What potential methodological problems or flaws in reasoning did you notice? 7. What are some alternative interpretations of the results? 8. Other comets. Please make sure that the sentences are short, simple and direct. Thanks.
CONTENT:
SEX DIFFERENCES IN HUMAN MATE PREFERENCESCustomer Name:Grade Course:Tutor`s Name:(04, December, 2010)Sex Differences in Human mate PreferencesThis is an article critique of the article “Sex-Differences in Human Mate Preferences: Evolutionary Hypothesis Tested in 37 Cultures” which is authored by Buss, David and published in “Behavioral and Brain Sciences Journal” in 1989.The study was conducted to provide clues in human reproductive history specifically on the characteristics that people value in potential mates. The research was intended to offer practically obtained evidences to support the five predicted hypotheses about sex difference in human mate preferences based on evolutionary conceptions. The research carried tested some evolutionary hypotheses to find out on the factors that humans consider when choosing a mate. Hypotheses tested cent...

Price: £ 99

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions