Details
- Title: WHO ARE THESE PROJECT MANAGERS
- Price: £ 109
- Post Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2025 18:41:29 +0000
- Category: Assignment
- No Plagiarism Guarantee
- 100% Custom Written
Customer Reviews
WHO ARE THESE PROJECT MANAGERS
100% Plagiarism-Free Work & Confidential Service
WHO ARE THESE PROJECT MANAGERS?
Matt recalled the meetings with project managers. He arranged those meetings to get to know who they were. He found that besides not having formal project management training, most of them did not have any experience outside Clement that they could relate to. Also there was a huge lack of internal credibility. Employees in other departments did not understand why they needed project managers. What project managers were really doing was the administrative function; posting project documentation on the website, etc. They knew that they needed to maintain project schedules but they were not trained how to put the schedule together to begin with. They picked up little tidbits of issues. Since they did not have a real project schedule, these project managers could not create any expectation and make any trade - off decisions. They did not know whether decisions they made impacted the rest of the project.
FIRST STEP: CREATING TEMPLATES
With his project management experience, Matt could provide the internal training to the project managers. However, projects were still going on and new ones were continuously coming in. He could not take project managers out of their job and conduct a week or two classroom training. Matt decided to develop templates to help the project managers in the meantime. He started off with maintenance release types of projects since all project managers were familiar with them. He also did some coaching and mentoring.
The template for maintenance release projects seems to have been a success. As Matt anticipated, these project managers were familiar with these projects. They could relate to them right away. The project managers understood key deliverables and dependencies. Matt started to feel a bit relieved that things seemed to be getting along fine. Then one day, he helped one project manager develop a schedule for a new product development project.
This is a typical issue, Matt recalled. These project managers seemed to be busy all the time but they were busy on activities that they should not have been doing. They seem to get themselves into the situations that they do more of the administrative stuff. Helping them come up to speed with the methodology wouldn’t help, Matt thinks. “I have to also help them have their priorities straight. ”
|
Example Marking Rubric for Assignment #: Total Marks 50 |
|
|
|||
|
Note: The marking rubrics varies for each assignment |
|
|
|||
|
Grade |
HD |
DI |
CR |
P |
Fail |
|
Mark |
40-50 |
35-44 |
30-34 |
25-29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent |
Very Good |
Good |
Satisfactory |
Unsatisfactory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
All topics are |
Topics are |
Generally |
Some relevance |
This is not |
|
|
pertinent and |
relevant and |
relevant and |
and briefly |
relevant to the |
|
/5 |
covered in depth. |
soundly |
analysed. |
presented. |
assignment |
|
|
Ability to think |
analysed. |
|
|
topic. |
|
|
critically and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
source material is |
|
|
|
|
|
|
demonstrated |
|
|
|
|
|
Identification |
Demonstrated |
Demonstrat |
Demonstrated |
Demonstrated |
Did not |
|
|
excellent ability to |
ed excellent |
ability to think |
ability to think |
demonstrate |
|
/10 |
think critically and |
ability to |
critically and |
critically and did |
ability to think |
|
|
sourced reference |
think |
sourced |
not source |
critically and |
|
|
material |
critically but |
reference |
reference |
did not source |
|
|
appropriately |
did not |
material |
material |
reference |
|
|
|
source |
appropriately |
appropriately |
material |
|
|
|
reference |
|
|
appropriately |
|
|
|
material |
|
|
|
|
|
|
appropriatel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
y |
|
|
|
|
Analyse |
Logic is clear and |
Consistency |
Mostly |
|
|
easy to follow with |
logical and |
consistent |
|
/10 |
strong arguments |
convincing |
logical and |
|
|
|
|
convincing |
|
Design |
All elements are |
Components |
Components |
|
|
present and very |
present with |
present and |
|
/10 |
well integrated. |
good |
mostly well |
|
|
|
cohesive |
integrated |
Adequate cohesion and conviction
Most components present
|
Evaluate/justific |
Excellent use of |
Extremely |
Good effort |
Made some |
|
ation |
creditable sources. |
good effort |
made but not |
effort. For |
|
|
Accurate |
|
outstanding |
example, Web |
|
|
referencing. |
|
|
searches only |
|
/5 |
Obvious that |
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding effort |
|
|
|
|
|
made |
|
|
|
|
Conclusion |
Logic is clear and |
Consistency |
Mostly |
Adequate |
|
|
easy to follow with |
logical and |
consistent |
cohesion and |
|
/5 |
strong arguments |
convincing |
logical and |
conviction |
|
|
|
|
convincing |
|
|
Reference style |
Clear styles with |
Clear |
Generally good |
Sometimes |
|
|
excellent source of |
referencing |
referencing |
clear |
|
/5 |
references. |
style |
style |
referencing |
|
|
|
|
|
style |
Argument is confused and disjointed
Proposal lacks structure.
Very little attempt to reference. Lazy effort with inaccuracies
Argument is confused and disjointed
Lacks consistency with many errors
Get professionally prepared work tailored to your requirements.
Original content • Confidential service • Tailored to your instructions
WHO ARE THESE PROJECT MANAGERS