We're Open
+44 7340 9595 39
+44 20 3239 6980

PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW AND DESCRIPTION OF THE NOMINATED WEBSITE

  100% Pass and No Plagiarism Guaranteed

PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW AND DESCRIPTION OF THE NOMINATED WEBSITE

Here, you are required to provide an overview and description of the nominated website. You are asked to support your observations and comments convincingly. You must only use the device simulator for your reviews. You are asked to include 5 displays and you can choose you simulated device.

Main Task

Select and undertake an in-depth evaluation of the following website:

 

Upon the completion of the task, you are to provide a formal report documenting your critical evaluation of the website. The review is to be carried out within the context of responsive web design (RWD) and development principles. The report should draw particular attention to the interactive aspects and design aspects relating to responsiveness of the overall website. Support your critique with appropriate RWD principles.

What to Review

The purpose of the report is to provide a critical evaluation of the nominated website and to support your observations and comments convincingly. The nominated website should be reviewed using Google Chrome’s device simulator. For the purpose and intention of this assessment, use only the device simulator for your reviews. This is to ensure that all students have access to consistent and identical review tools.

Your review of the nominated website must be thorough and sufficiently comprehensive to include 5 different screen displays. The recommended settings are as follows. Students are free to select the different simulated device (in the Chrome device simulator) they would like to use for the reviews.

(1)Large Display

Generic notebook or desktop with display greater than 1280x768 pixels.

(2)Medium Display

Any mobile device with display approximately 480x640 to 700x960 pixels, in both landscape and portrait orientation.

(3)Tiny display

Any mobile device with display approximately 200x320 to 400x640 pixels, in both landscape and portrait orientation.

 

What to Include

Your report should include:

(1)Clearly identify the nominated website. Provide an overview and description of the nominated website.

(2)Identify and elaborate the main feature or features of the website.

(3)Identify the positive and negative aspects of the website. Draw particular attention to the interaction and usability aspects of the interface.

(4)Invite two other persons to review the nominated website. All reviewers should use identical device settings. These participants can be your friends, family members or classmates etc. Provide the background (i.e. age, gender, profession) of the participants. Do their views differ from yours’? State why or why not.

(5)Based upon your critique and observation in items (1) to (4) of the above, provide a recommendation on how the website should be improved. Conversely, if it does not require further improvement, then provide the reason why that this is the case.

(6)Except for item (4) of the above, all assertions relating to RWD design principles (e.g. statements like ‘blue text on red background is a poor colour combination’ ) must be supported by references or critical observation. You can cite additional scholarly references other than the textbook. (Note: Do not use Wikipedia as a source of reference).

(7)Comment on the tools (i.e. Chrome device simulator) you used for the review. Elaborate on

the advantages and disadvantages of such a tool. Search and briefly comment on similar tools available for testing and reviewing RWD web pages.

(8) Figures or diagrams can be added as needed.

Format of Report

For the purpose of this written assessment you are assumed to be a postgraduate student capable of producing a high quality report. As such, you should attempt at your best to reflect this quality in the preparation of the written assessment. As a minimum, the report should contain the following, but not limited to:

(1)Introduction – State the purpose and objectives of the report.

(2)Discussion – Build your arguments into a cohesive thread, presenting your observations and findings that you have collated from section (1) to (4) from ‘What to Include’ section.

(3)Recommendation – This is the section where you present your recommendations.

(4)Conclusion – Summarise your findings, consolidating and drawing attention to the main points of the report.

(5)References.

(6)Number of words: 3,000 (maximum) number of words. Your word count should include figure captions and references.

 

Assessment Criteria

The following criteria will be used to assess the quality of your report:

 

Criteria

Sub-Total

 

 

 

Review and Evaluation:

 

 

• Overview and description. (3 marks)

 

 

• Identify and elaborate main features. (6 marks)

 

 

• Identify the positive and negative aspects. (6 marks)

30

 

• Reviews and comments from two other participants. (6 marks)

 

 

• Recommendation on improvements to be made, or otherwise. (6 marks)

 

 

• Demonstrates that in-depth evaluation have been undertaken. (3 marks)

 

 

Relevance to Principles of RWD:

 

 

• Arguments and assertions are sound. (6 marks)

 

 

• Arguments and assertions are supported by RWD principles. (6 marks)

30

 

• Arguments are developed consistently and logically. (6 marks)

 

 

 

• Demonstrates understanding of the RWD subject matter and applying

 

 

this competently to the review. (12 marks)

 

 

Simulation Software Tool Used for Review

 

 

• Advantages and disadvantages of simulation tool used in the review of RWD web

 

 

pages. (10 marks)

20

 

• Comment on similar tools available for testing and reviewing RWD web pages.

 

 

(10 marks)

 

 

Presentation:

 

 

• Report professionally presented. (2 marks)

 

 

• Grammar, spelling, written style and expression (2 marks)

10

 

• Citation and references. (3 marks)

 

 

• Overall presentation. (3 marks)

 

 

 

 

 

Total marks for this assignment

90

 

(Total of 90 marks to be scaled down to 30)

 

 

 


100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

View our samples written by our professional writers to let you comprehend how your work is going to look like. We have categorised this into 3 categories with a few different subject domains

View Our Samples

We offer a £ 2999

If your assignment is plagiarised, we will give you £ 2999 in compensation

Recent Updates

Details

  • Title: PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW AND DESCRIPTION OF THE NOMINATED WEBSITE
  • Price: £ 109
  • Post Date: 2020-04-14T14:40:39+00:00
  • Category: Assignment Queries
  • No Plagiarism Guarantee
  • 100% Custom Written

Customer Reviews

PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW AND DESCRIPTION OF THE NOMINATED WEBSITE PROVIDE AN OVERVIEW AND DESCRIPTION OF THE NOMINATED WEBSITE
Reviews: 5

A masterpiece of assignment by , written on 2020-03-12

CIPD assignment is not my cup of tea. That’s the reason I sought out this place suggested by my friend. I would say that the writers of this site are really admiring. I was assigned the best CIPD writer that solved all my issues. He explained to me the difficult topics so well that now I am able to talk on those topics eloquently. I owe my writer a huge thanks and praise! And yes, I would recommend other students as well to come to instaresearch.co.uk for the top CIPD assignment help.
Reviews: 5

A masterpiece of assignment by , written on 2020-03-12

Writing is not my field. I take help from this website for my accounting assignment. The work is good and I scored good grades in it. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.