We write, we don’t plagiarise! Every answer is different no matter how many orders we get for the same assignment. Your answer will be 100% plagiarism-free, custom written, unique and different from every other student.
I agree to receive phone calls from you at night in case of emergency
Please share your assignment brief and supporting material (if any) via email here at: support@instaresearch.co.uk after completing this order process.
No Plagiarism Guarantee - 100% Custom Written
In this assignment, you are asked to prepare the opening statements for the affirmative and opposing sides in a debate on punishment, justice, and reform proposition. Also, draw on concepts concerned with the principles of punishment and sentencing as well as arguments based on theoretical understandings of punishment
Based on the readings for the first three weeks of this unit, prepare the opening statements for the affirmative and opposing sides in a debate on the following proposition: (Punishment, Justice and Reform)
Punishment in contemporary society is no longer focused on correction. It is more concerned with managing crime at an acceptable level.
Each student will submit in writing the opening statement for the affirmative (500 words) and the opposition (500 words) – a total of 1000 words.You should draw on concepts concerned with the principles of punishment and sentencing as well as arguments based on theoretical understandings of punishment (for more detail see the Study Guide, p.13).
Punishment, Justice and Reform
1st Affirmative1) Define the topic: explain the issue of the debate, briefly describingthe argument that each side must present.2) Present affirmative case statement: this should briefly summarizethe main argument of the team.3) Present case division: state the arguments to be presented by the firstand second speakers (third speakers need not be mentioned, as theirrole is rebuttal).4) Present arguments: attempt to set out each argument separately andthematically, with the most important coming first. The first speakermay need to introduce a ‘model’ or a ‘test’. (See the provideddocument below for more on models and tests.)5) Summarise: the speaker should briefly summarise the argumentsraised in her/his speech, reiterate the arguments that are to bepresented by the second speaker and link these to the case statement.o 1st Negative1) Where necessary, clarify the issue established by the affirmative’sdefinition.2) Present negative case statement: this should briefly summarize themain argument of the team.3) Present rebuttal: this should be thematic and address the mostimportant points raised by the first affirmative speaker.4) Present case division: state the arguments to be presented by the firstand second speakers (third speakers need not be mentioned, as theirrole is rebuttal).5) Present arguments: attempt to set out each argument separately andthematically, with the most important coming first. The first speakermay need to introduce a ‘counter model’.6) Summarise: the speaker should briefly summarise the argumentsraised in her/his speech, reiterate the arguments that are to bepresented by the second speaker and link these to the case statement
(Punishment, Justice and Reform)