We write, we don’t plagiarise! Every answer is different no matter how many orders we get for the same assignment. Your answer will be 100% plagiarism-free, custom written, unique and different from every other student.
I agree to receive phone calls from you at night in case of emergency
Please share your assignment brief and supporting material (if any) via email here at: [email protected] after completing this order process.
No Plagiarism Guarantee - 100% Custom Written
Learning outcomes to be examined in this assessment
awareness of professional ethics, leadership and
staff management as an accounting and finance
professional in a business environment.
completion of self-analysis/reflection.
weaknesses, and opportunities professionally in
accounting and finance.
personal strengths in relation to the environment.
Percentage of marks awarded for module:
This portfolio assignment is worth 25% of the total marks for the module
Explanatory comments on the assessment criteria
Maximum marks for each section
Content, style, relevance, originality
Clear demonstration of rigorous research from recognised authoritative sources. Audience focus.
Format, referencing, bibliography
Constructive critical analysis, introduction, conclusion
Demonstration of a clear understanding of the issues, use academic models
Task 2 (500 words)
You are appointed as the manager of a sports club in London which uses “Blake and Mouton model of management”. Write a business letter to the CEO regarding the effectiveness of the management style followed by the organisation.
You are required to:
Total marks for the Task 2: 25
Very high standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual frameworks.
Excellent understanding and exposition of relevant issues.
Clearly structured and logically developed arguments.
Good awareness of nuances and complexities.
Substantial evidence of well-executed independent research.
Excellent evaluation and synthesis of source material.
Relevant data and examples, all properly referenced.
High standard of critical analysis using appropriate conceptual frameworks.
Clear awareness and exposition of relevant issues.
Clearly structured and logically developed argument.
Awareness of nuances and complexities.
Evidence of independent research.
Good evaluation and synthesis of source material.
Uses appropriate conceptual frameworks.
Attempts analysis but includes some errors and /or omissions.
Shows awareness of issues but no more than to be expected room attendance at classes.
Arguments reasonably clear but underdeveloped.
Insufficient evidence of independent research.
Insufficient evaluation of source material.
Some good use of relevant data and examples but incompletely referenced.
An understanding of appropriate conceptual frameworks.
Answer too descriptive and or any attempt at analysis is superficial containing errors and omission.
Shows limited awareness of issues but also some confusion.
Arguments not particularly clear.
Limited evidence of independent research and reliance on a superficial repeat of class notes.
Relatively superficial use of relevant data sources and examples and poorly referenced.
Weak understanding of appropriate conceptual frameworks. Weak analysis and several errors and omissions.
Establishes a few relevant points but superficial and confused exposition of issues.
No evidence of independent research and poor understanding of class notes or no use of relevant data, sources and examples and no references.