|
Analysis of the ethical dilemma using the ACS Code of Conduct
|
Correctly maps the ethical issues within the case to the right sections of the Code (including section numbers).
Explains the link between the ethical issues and the elements of the Code supported by evidence from the literature.
Makes a convincing recommendation and justifies it using supporting arguments based on the literature.
Demonstrates solid understanding of the Code.
|
Adequately maps the ethical issues within the case to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers).
Explains the link between the ethical issues and the elements of the Code.
The recommendation made is reasonable and is supported with a justification
Demonstrates a good understanding of the Code.
|
Makes a genuine attempt at mapping the ethical issues within the case to the correct sections of the Code (including section numbers).
Explains to some extent the link between the ethical issues and the elements of the Code.
The recommendation made makes sense and an attempt is made to support it with a justification.
|
Few ethical issues within the case are correctly mapped to the right sections of the Code (including section numbers).
The analysis does not explain well the link between the ethical issues and the elements of the Code.
The recommendation made makes sense but is not supported with a justification
|
Incorrectly maps the ethical issues within the case to the sections of the Code (including section numbers).
The analysis of the ethical issues in light of the elements of the Code is poor.
The recommendation made makes no sense
|
|
Writing & structure
|
Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, concisely, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose with no spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors.
|
Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas.
Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.
Grammar & spelling accurate.
|
Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas.
Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.
Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors.
|
The text contains frequent errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and structure, lacks clarity, and is not concise, but the meaning is apparent to the reader with some effort.
|
Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas.
Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner.
Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised.
Grammar & spelling contains many errors.
|
|
Referencing
|
Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms exactly to APA style conventions.
|
Very good referencing, including reference list and citations.
High quality references.
|
Good referencing, including reference list and citations.
Good quality references.
|
Referencing is comprehensive, mostly accurate according to APA style conventions, and demonstrates academic integrity. Some minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, etc) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or demonstration of academic integrity.
|
Sub-standard (or no) referencing.
Poor quality (or no) references.
|
ETHICAL DILEMMA AND ETHICALLY QUESTIONABLE SITUATION