We write, we don’t plagiarise! Every answer is different no matter how many orders we get for the same assignment. Your answer will be 100% plagiarism-free, custom written, unique and different from every other student.
I agree to receive phone calls from you at night in case of emergency
Please share your assignment brief and supporting material (if any) via email here at: email@example.com after completing this order process.
No Plagiarism Guarantee - 100% Custom Written
Rob Heywood, in “RIP Sidaway: patient-oriented disclosure – a standard worth waiting for?” (2015) 23 Medical Law review 455-66, remarks that “Possibly the most remarkable thing about Sidaway  AC 871 is that it was allowed to lurk in the background for so long”.
Discuss Heywood’s comment in light of the case law following Sidaway, and Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board .
- Look at the two cases and the source the quote is from- It is important to look at the shift in the two cases.- Journal articles are essential. 5+ needed- Essay needs to be academic - Critical analysis of quote- Evaluate quote in light of cases