We're Open
+44 7340 9595 39
+44 20 3239 6980

DEVELOP SNORT IDS RULES TO DETECT EXPLOITS OF FICTITIOUS VULNERABILITY

  100% Pass and No Plagiarism Guaranteed

DEVELOP SNORT IDS RULES TO DETECT EXPLOITS OF FICTITIOUS VULNERABILITY

This question presents a fictitious security vulnerability in a range of lasers printers.  The question requires that you develop SNORT IDS rules to detect exploits of this fictitious vulnerability. All information regarding this vulnerability is fabricated to give the illusion of a real security threat.  As a result, searches on the Internet will not yield any information regarding the signature of this vulnerability.  All the information required to detect exploits for this vulnerability are presented in this question, except where noted otherwise.

You are a security specialist working for XYZ Incorporated.  XYZ use SNORT as their NIDS which protects both their IP sub-networks being 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24.

A security vulnerability has been detected in the Humphrey Pollard Laserprint 12050 printer model.  This vulnerability is remotely exploitable and allows the execution of arbitrary code.

There is a bug in the way the printer processes the postscript spool management header.  A sample of a spool header is given below:

%!PS-Adobe-3.0 %%Creator: texttops/CUPS v1.2.2%%CreationDate: Thu 21 Sep 2006 11:49:57 AM EST%%Title: TODO %%For: username %%DocumentNeededResources: font Courier-Bold …

The printer’s code which parses these headers only allows 8 bytes for the “%%For” field value buffer in memory.  In the example above, the field value is “username”.  It is possible to overflow the buffer by providing a value to the “%%For” field that is greater than 8 bytes. The “%%For” field can be found anywhere in the packet.

An exploit has been released in the form of a worm which when infecting the Laser printer’s memory, tricks the laser printer into emailing all documents received for printing to an email account in Russia.  The worm propagates by scanning networks in proximity of its own for other vulnerable printers.  On finding vulnerable machines, it copies itself to them and the cycle continues. It also propagates via email as a PDF attachment.  The malicious code is embedded in the PDF file. The email message suggests that the attached document contains a joke and requires printing to a laser printer to view.  When the user prints the PDF, its payload is sent to the printer either directly, or via a printer spooling server.  Effectively, this means the worm can attack printers from any host on the network.

If a printer is found to be compromised, power-cycling (turning off and then on) the printer will erase the worm from the printer’s volatile memory.  However, this does not prevent the printer from being re-infected.

You are required to write 2 SNORT IDS rules labeled (a) and (b) to manage this vulnerability until patches are applied and printers reset.

Rule (a) must detect attempts to exploit this vulnerability on any printer in the company network.  The rule should scan for attempts from any host on the network to any host on the network.  It should also scan only for connections to the Jetdirect printing TCP/IP port number, used by this range of printers. You may need to research Jetdirect to identify which port number it uses for printing and what transport protocol. Google is a good place to start.

The signature of the exploit is given as follows:

%%For: username

The value “username” can be any sequence of characters, but must be exactly 8 characters long. For example, “username” could be “abcdefgh”.  Note also there is a space between the colon and “username”.  Immediately following the 8 characters for the username is the payload of the exploit, which is given below as decimal byte values:

124 185 30 135 99 214 51 29

Your rule should match the entire sequence as described above starting from “%%For:” through to the last decimal byte of the exploit payload “29”.  On detecting packets, your rule should generate an alert with a message stating: “Attempt to exploit laser printer vulnerability”.

Rule (b) must detect attempts by the malicious payload running on any infected printers to email documents to the Internet. You have 6 printers on your network that are vulnerable to this attack.  Their IP addresses are:

192.168.1.45
192.168.1.40 
192.168.2.15 
192.168.2.30 
192.168.2.31 
192.168.2.40 

Your email rule must apply only to the vulnerable printers on the network.  In other words, your rule should detect attempts to email the hacker from only the above printers, and no other hosts.

This model of laser printer also provides scanning and faxing capabilities.  When the scanning function is used, the unit will email the scanned document to an Internet email address given by the user when scanning. As a result, it is normal behaviour for these printers to send emails via SMTP.  Therefore, it is necessary to check the recipient email address of the document.  The rule should detect attempts to email users outside of the organisation, as no document should be emailed outside the company from a printer.  The organisation’s domain name is: xyzcorp.com.au.  So any emails sent to an address of form: [email protected] should not be detected as these addresses are for company employees.  Any other email addresses without the exact domain name above should be detected. Any mail server could be used to deliver the email.  On detecting an email from one of these printers to an address outside the organisation, your rule should generate an alert with the message: “Compromised printer attempting to email document outside organisation”

For both rules, be sure to complete the following.

1.    Allocate an appropriate SID value and a revision number.
2.    Designate an appropriate class type for this attack.
3.    Annotate your rules with comments describing what each component of the rule does, so other security specialists in your team can see how your rules are written.
4.    Comments can be introduced to your rules file snort.conf by preceding each line with a hash character “#”.  Anything after the hash character to the end of the line will be treated as a comment by SNORT and ignored by the rule parsing code.

An example of how to present your rules in your assignment document is shown below:

# Your explanation of the below in italics
var HOME_NET 138.77.23.0/16
var EXTERNAL_NET !138.77.23.0/16 
# Your explanation of the below 
drop udp $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET 993 
#Your explanation of the below, and so on... 
... 

An example explanation for a SNORT rule option: 

# The content of the packet must contain the string “USER root” to be matched.
# Furthermore, the offset option specifies that the string “USER root” should be
# matched exactly 10 bytes from the beginning of the packet.  In other words, it will
# only match packets where 10 bytes from the start of the payload, the string
# “USER root” is specified.

content: “USER root”; offset:10; 

Testing your rule

A pcap dump file has been provided which includes the signatures for both the laser printer exploit, and the email messages that are sent from infected printers.  This file serves two purposes. Firstly, it allows you to analyse the format of normal and malicious packets. Using Wireshark, you are able to open the pcap dump file, look at the format of the packets, and search for the malicious ones using the information in this document.  Secondly, the pcap dump file can be used with SNORT to test your rules.  To do the above, you need have installed SNORT and Wireshark on your home computer.

Instructions on how to  obtain these applications are available on the course website under the “Software Resources” section.

To test your rule with SNORT, copy the sample.pcap file to a working folder on your computer.  In this same folder, create a sub-folder called “logs”.  Open up notepad and save an empty file in your working folder called “snort.conf”.  This file will contain your rules. As you change the rules in notepad, resave the file.  Now to test your rule using SNORT, you execute the SNORT program from a command window as follows:

c:snortbinsnort.exe –r sample.pcap –c snort.conf  –l log

(This is an example – your install location for SNORT may differ.  Note also this is a windows example – you may use Linux or OS X to complete this assignment).

Check the output of the alert.ids file to see which packets have been detected by your rules. Also check the packet dump files as generated by SNORT using Wireshark which give the full packet content that were detected by your rules.  They are the files named “snort.log.{number}” where {number} is the timestamp value of when you ran SNORT.  This provides a history of each time you execute SNORT.  The greatest number is the newest version. You can drag these files from explorer window onto the Wireshark window. Also, alerts are appended to the end of your alert.ids file each time you execute SNORT. So just a hint:  before you run SNORT each time to test your rules, delete the alerts file and the dump files so it is less confusing.  Otherwise, they can be hard to read. Reviewing these logs files are essential to helping you to identify where you have gone wrong with your rules.

Your alert.ids file should contain the following:

[**] [1:1000022:1] Attempt to exploit laser printer vulnerability [**]
[Classification: <>] [Priority: 1]
09/21-11:49:57.965425 192.168.2.31:49140 -> 192.168.2.30:9100
TCP TTL:64 TOS:0x0 ID:39862 IpLen:20 DgmLen:782 DF
***A**** Seq: 0x31A554DB  Ack: 0xFCFF2DD  Win: 0xB7  TcpLen: 32
TCP Options (3) => NOP NOP TS: 23973781 489101

[**] [1:1000022:1] Attempt to exploit laser printer vulnerability [**]
[Classification: <>] [Priority: 1]
09/21-11:50:13.094991 192.168.2.11:49144 -> 192.168.2.40:9100
TCP TTL:64 TOS:0x0 ID:44774 IpLen:20 DgmLen:782 DF
***A**** Seq: 0x322170AB  Ack: 0x100D84CB  Win: 0xB7  TcpLen: 32
TCP Options (3) => NOP NOP TS: 23977563 489132

[**] [1:1000021:1] Compromised printer attempting to email document outside organisation [**]
[Classification: <>] [Priority: 2]
09/21-14:57:32.058922 192.168.2.40:1941 -> 192.168.1.4:25
TCP TTL:128 TOS:0x0 ID:65489 IpLen:20 DgmLen:70 DF
***AP*** Seq: 0xFC0CF9C8  Ack: 0x32CC7240  Win: 0xFE7D  TcpLen: 20

[**] [1:1000021:1] Compromised printer attempting to email document outside organisation [**]
[Classification: <>] [Priority: 2]
09/21-15:02:40.010228 192.168.1.40:1955 -> 192.168.1.4:25
TCP TTL:128 TOS:0x0 ID:5281 IpLen:20 DgmLen:70 DF
***AP*** Seq: 0x9B7E2E43  Ack: 0x463DFBEF  Win: 0xFE7C  TcpLen: 20

Note:  The classification identifer has been deleted. If your alert.ids file is different to the above, you have false positives or false negatives.  This means your rule is not specific enough, or is too specific.  Identify which alerts are incorrect in your file and open the snort.log.{number} dump file to view their contents to see where you have gone wrong. If you are missing alerts, then identify the timestamp in the alert.ids file given above and search for the same packet in the sample.pcap file using Wireshark. Instructions on how to do this using Wireshark are given below in the tips section. 

Tips: 

•    Search for the SMTP RFC document “RFC0821” via google.  In particular, you will need to familiarise yourself with the “RCPT TO:” SMTP command.  This is the format you need to check for to detect safe receiving email addresses. 

•    Use Wireshark to analyse the pcap dump file.  You can identify which packets contain the exploit by using the “Edit” menu, and “Find Packet” option.  You can specify a String value and search in the “Packet bytes” to find the signatures of the vulnerability. 

•    Make use of SNORT to test your rule.  Check the output from your alerts file with what is provided in this document to see if you have implemented your rule properly. In particular, check for false positives, and false negatives.  

•    The alert.ids file generated by SNORT on execution will provide the headers of the packets that were detected by your rules.  If you wish to see the full contents of these packets, you can search for them in the pcap dump file using Wireshark.  The headers of the packet in the alert.ids file include the timestamp when the packet was captured.  You can search for the exact timestamp in the pcap file to find the same packet.  This can be done by changing the settings of Wireshark to show the absolute time of the packets, rather than an offset from the very first packet.  Then if you wanted to find the packet in the alert.ids file with the timestamp: “11:49:57.965425”, you would search for the same string in Wireshark.  To change the display format for the timestamp in Wireshark:  

1.    Click “View” menu 
2.    Click “Time display format” option 
3.    Click “Time of day” 

•    Certain characters are “special” in SNORT rules.  These characters must be escaped to tell SNORT to treat them literally, rather than interpret their special meaning.  To escape a special character, you simply precede it with a back-slash “”.  For example, if you wish to continue your rule on a new line in the configuration file, then you end the line with a “” character to escape the special meaning of the ENTER character at the end of the line. SNORT treats the ENTER character as special.  It means it is the end of the current rule. With a “” at the end of the line, it tells SNORT to treat it as a literal ENTER which will be interpreted as just spacing for your rule and allows it to continue on the next line. If you receive the following error when you attempt to run your rule through SNORT: “ParsePattern Got Null enclosed in quotation marks (")!”, then you have a special character in your rule content that needs to be escaped.  Refer to the SNORT documentation website for details on which characters have special meanings.   

•    Research how to express a group of unrelated individual IP addresses as a source or destination. 

•    Make sure you include the classtype in your rule.  Refer to the SNORT documentation to determine which classtype is appropriate for this exploit as described above.   You will probably have to make use of the classification.config file (located in the Snortetc directory) – research how to make reference to this file from your rules file.

•    Failure to use the correct syntax in your rule will mean the rule is ineffective.  This means you will lose marks on this question.   

•    Refer to the Snort manual for assistance in writing the rules – a link to the manual is availed from the Software Resources section of the course web site. 

Note: Duplicating the contents from the text, lecture slides, weekly notes or the Internet is not acceptable (even if it is referenced) and will not attract any marks.  Your solutions must be written in your own words. If you cannot write your answer in your own words, then you have not yet mastered the topic and require further reading or advice from your tutor. Any information taken from an external source (either from the textbook or any other source) must be referenced appropriately.  Failure to do so constitutes plagiarism.


100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

View our samples written by our professional writers to let you comprehend how your work is going to look like. We have categorised this into 3 categories with a few different subject domains

View Our Samples

We offer a £ 2999

If your assignment is plagiarised, we will give you £ 2999 in compensation

Recent Updates

Details

  • Title: DEVELOP SNORT IDS RULES TO DETECT EXPLOITS OF FICTITIOUS VULNERABILITY
  • Price: £ 109
  • Post Date: 2018-11-08T13:00:47+00:00
  • Category: Assignment
  • No Plagiarism Guarantee
  • 100% Custom Written

Customer Reviews

DEVELOP SNORT IDS RULES TO DETECT EXPLOITS OF FICTITIOUS VULNERABILITY DEVELOP SNORT IDS RULES TO DETECT EXPLOITS OF FICTITIOUS VULNERABILITY
Reviews: 5

A masterpiece of assignment by , written on 2020-03-12

I received my order last night and now I’m writing my reviews. My assignment has all the points I needed along with a good style. The citations used are relatable and professional. The best thing is the discount I got because I recommended my friend too to use their service. I am so pleased to use this effective service. The features are also amazing, everything is good. Will come again soon!
Reviews: 5

A masterpiece of assignment by , written on 2020-03-12

My writer did a small error in my work but it was fixed by him shortly. The work is admirable and I have submitted it. Now hoping for the best results. I would inform you soon.