We're Open
+44 7340 9595 39
+44 20 3239 6980

# Consider the following autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation coefficients estimated using 500 observations from a weakly sta

100% Pass and No Plagiarism Guaranteed

### Consider the following autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation coefficients estimated using 500 observations from a weakly stationary stochastic process

Question 3 [25 marks]

You estimate the model

_ = + _ + ,

using quarterly data. Results are reported in Table 1.

Table 1: OLS estimates using 174 observations

Dependent variable: Interest rate

 Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. CONSTANT 0.045836 0.113503 0.403833 0.6869 INFLATION 0.204347 0.020596 9.921921 0.0000 OUTPUT GAP 0.022601 0.063539 0.355710 0.7225 R-squared ? Mean dependent var 0.753494 Adjusted R-squared ? S.D. dependent var 1.415286 S.E. of regression 1.114094 Akaike info criterion 3.072648 Sum squared resid 193.6281 Schwarz criterion 3.130552 Log likelihood -241.2755 Hannan-Quinn criter. 3.096162 F-statistic 49.48873 Durbin-Watson stat 0.051860 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

a)Are and statistically significant? Explain.

b)Calculate and adjusted using the results reported in Table 1. Discuss the two statistics and the results obtained.

Question 4 [25 marks]

a)Consider the following autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation coefficients estimated using 500 observations from a weakly stationary stochastic process :

 Lag ACF PACF 1 0.307 0.307 2 -0.013 0.264 3 0.086 0.147 4 0.031 0.086 5 -0.019 0.049

3

Which of the autocorrelations are statistically significantly different from 0? Also, using both the Box-Pierce and the Ljung-Box test statistics, test the null hypothesis that the first five autocorrelations are all jointly equal to 0.

b)What process would you tentatively suggest could represent the most appropriate model for the series whose ACF and PACF are presented in part (a)? Explain your answer.

c)Two researchers are asked to estimate an ARMA model for a daily USD/GBP exchange rate return series,denoted . Researcher uses the Bayesian Information Criterion for determining the appropriate model and arrives at an

ARMA(0,1). Research uses Akaike’s Information Criterion which deems an

ARMA(2,0) to be optimal. The estimated models are

: ̂ = 0.38 + 0.10−1

: ̂ = 0.63 + 0.17−1 − 0.09−2

where is a White noiseprocess.

You are given the following data:

 = 0.31, −1 = 0.02, −2 = −0.16 −1 = 0.13, −2 = 0.19 Produce forecasts for=the−0.02,next from both models. 4 days, i.e., for times + 1, + 2, + 3, and + 4,

d)How could you determine whether the models proposed in part (c) are adequate?

e)Suppose that the actual values of the series on days + 1+ 2+ 3, and + 4turned out to be 0.620.19−0.32, and 0.72, respectively. Determine which researcher’s model produced the most accurate forecasts.

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,

International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

## STILL NOT CONVINCED?

View our samples written by our professional writers to let you comprehend how your work is going to look like. We have categorised this into 3 categories with a few different subject domains

View Our Samples

#### We offer a £ 2999

If your assignment is plagiarised, we will give you £ 2999 in compensation

Oct,21,2021

Oct,21,2021

Oct,21,2021

### Details

• Title: Consider the following autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation coefficients estimated using 500 observations from a weakly stationary stochastic process
• Price: £ 99
• Post Date: 2018-11-10T08:09:33+00:00
• Category: Assignment
• No Plagiarism Guarantee
• 100% Custom Written

### Customer Reviews

Consider the following autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation coefficients estimated using 500 observations from a weakly stationary stochastic process
Reviews: 5

### A masterpiece of assignment by Meredith, written on 2020-03-12

I was worried about the plagiarism ration in my dissertation. But thanks to my dedicated writer, I received 0% plagiarism in all the chapters. I owe my writer a million thanks..!
Reviews: 5

### A masterpiece of assignment by Sean Zhang , written on 2020-03-12

My writer did a small error in my work but it was fixed by him shortly. The work is admirable and I have submitted it. Now hoping for the best results. I would inform you soon.