We write, we don’t plagiarise! Every answer is different no matter how many orders we get for the same assignment. Your answer will be 100% plagiarism-free, custom written, unique and different from every other student.
I agree to receive phone calls from you at night in case of emergency
Please share your assignment brief and supporting material (if any) via email here at: [email protected] after completing this order process.
No Plagiarism Guarantee - 100% Custom Written
Compare and contrast two parenting programmes, identifying one as most useful to support a particular parenting population.
Promoting and Enhancing Parenting
Assessment 2: Guidelines for 2,500 word Report.
This assessment will take the form of a report. The report will compare and contrast two parenting programmes, identifying one as most useful to support a particular parenting population.
This report will be composed of the following key sections
You must be able to critically analyse each programme in relation to its ability to meet the needs/objectives of the parenting population. Continually refer back to the original objectives and the values and aims teased from the current Government agenda in order to justify the decisions you are making.
This section should end with a conclusion identifying the selected programme and the reasons why your particular choice of programme is optimal for your family. This should also include a brief analysis of the proposal for how the application and effectiveness of the programme will be evaluated.
Promoting and Enhancing Parenting: Assessment 2
Report and Evaluation
Student I.D. Number:
Personal Academic Tutor:
Section One of Parenting Report –
• Brief review of profile
Two programmes explained in terms of
• Psychological foundation
• Other features such as Target population (i.e. age)
Programmes contrasted and compared:
• Drawing on strengths/weaknesses of programmes
• Reference made to research
Programmes matched to population on the basis of:
• Optimum delivery style
Evaluations of Programme:
• Evaluation model is appropriate and justified
• The evaluation proposal is set explained
• Potential limitations and strengths of evaluation model have been discussed
• Structure of report is clear and well presented
• Wide use of references and appropriate referencing style