We're Open
support@instaresearch.co.uk
+44 7340 9595 39
+44 20 3239 6980

Brief for Petitioner Question

Information



  • Post Date 2018-11-05T12:48:53+00:00
  • Post Category Essays

No Plagiarism Guarantee - 100% Custom Written

Order Details

Brief for Petitioner Question

Brief for Petitioner Question

INSTRUCTIONS:

I will send all instructions via email this is a link to a website that should help substantially with the research. http://www2.bloomberglaw.com/public/desktop/document/United_States_v_Wurie_No_111792_2013_BL_132891_2013_ILRC_1959_1st

CONTENT:
No. 13 - 212IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES______________________________________________________________________________UNITED STATESPetitionerv.BRIMA WURIERespondent______________________________________________________________________________ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THEUNITED STATESCOURT OF APPEALS FOR THEFIRST CIRCUIT______________________________________________________________________________Brief for PetitionerQuestion PresentedUnder the Fourth Amendment, can the police conduct a warrantless search of an arrestee`s cell phone if it poses as a source of evidence or information relevant to the investigation?TABLE OF CONTENTSQuestion Presented......................................................................................................................iTable of Authorities................................................................................................................... iiiOpinions Below….......................................................................................................................1Statement of Jurisdiction….........................................................................................................1Constitutional Provisions involved..............................................................................................1Statement of The Case………………..........................................................................................2Summary of Argument………….................................................................................................4Argument ……….........................................................................................................................5 * THE WARRANTLESS SEARCH OF THE RESPONDENTS CELL PHONE DID NOT VIOLATE THE RESPONDENT`S RIGHTS AS PROVIDED BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT……………………………………………. * THE COURT OF APPEALS RULING SHOULD NOT HAVE GRANTED BLANKET PROHIBITION AND CONTRADICTS DECISIONS OF FOURTH, FIFTH AND SEVENTH CIRCUITS...…………………….………………… * THE SEARCH WAS REASONABLE IN ACCORDANCE TO PREVAILING CIRCU...
 

Price: £ 99

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions