CONTENT:
No. 13 - 212IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES______________________________________________________________________________UNITED STATESPetitionerv.BRIMA WURIERespondent______________________________________________________________________________ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THEUNITED STATESCOURT OF APPEALS FOR THEFIRST CIRCUIT______________________________________________________________________________Brief for PetitionerQuestion PresentedUnder the Fourth Amendment, can the police conduct a warrantless search of an arrestee`s cell phone if it poses as a source of evidence or information relevant to the investigation?TABLE OF CONTENTSQuestion Presented......................................................................................................................iTable of Authorities................................................................................................................... iiiOpinions Below….......................................................................................................................1Statement of Jurisdiction….........................................................................................................1Constitutional Provisions involved..............................................................................................1Statement of The Case………………..........................................................................................2Summary of Argument………….................................................................................................4Argument ……….........................................................................................................................5 * THE WARRANTLESS SEARCH OF THE RESPONDENTS CELL PHONE DID NOT VIOLATE THE RESPONDENT`S RIGHTS AS PROVIDED BY THE FOURTH AMENDMENT……………………………………………. * THE COURT OF APPEALS RULING SHOULD NOT HAVE GRANTED BLANKET PROHIBITION AND CONTRADICTS DECISIONS OF FOURTH, FIFTH AND SEVENTH CIRCUITS...…………………….………………… * THE SEARCH WAS REASONABLE IN ACCORDANCE TO PREVAILING CIRCU...
Brief for Petitioner Question