We're Open
support@instaresearch.co.uk
+44 7340 9595 39
+44 20 3239 6980

A1: List three environmental cues and indicate how they influence your expectations for communication?

Information



  • Post Date 2018-11-05T04:15:46+00:00
  • Post Category Assignment Requirements

No Plagiarism Guarantee - 100% Custom Written

Order Details

A1: List three environmental cues and indicate how they influence your expectations for communication?

Please make sure you read the question to ensure you answer each part as asked.

Be aware of the different requirements when asked to analyse, compare, contrast, explain, discuss or describe etc

You must cite any work from others.
You must reference all sources. 
You must qualify (or validate) statements you make

Your personal opinions need to be supported with evidence. 

You ONLY have to answer the Reflective Journal questions NOT the Personal Reflections.

Rubric

Journal A Communications

Journal A Communications

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion

A1: List three environmental cues and indicate how they influence your expectations for communication?

4.0 Pts

Full marks

Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources

3.0 Pts

Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources

2.0 Pts

Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question

1.0 Pts

Superficial or partial response

0.0 Pts

No response or response did not address question

0.0 Pts

No marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion

A2: Does the communicator have a responsibility to the audience? Does the audience have a responsibility to the speaker? Provide a justification for your view.

4.0 Pts

Full marks

Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources

3.0 Pts

Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources

2.0 Pts

Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question

1.0 Pts

Superficial or partial response

0.0 Pts

No response or response did not address question

0.0 Pts

No marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion

A6: Is there ever a justifiable use for doublespeak? Why or why not? Explain your response and give some examples.

4.0 Pts

Full marks

Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources

3.0 Pts

Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources

2.0 Pts

Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question

1.0 Pts

Superficial or partial response

0.0 Pts

No response or response did not address question

0.0 Pts

No marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion

A7: Find an article or listen to a presentation that uses signposts. Identify the signposts and explain how they help the audience follow the article or presentation.

4.0 Pts

Full marks

Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources

3.0 Pts

Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources

2.0 Pts

Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question

1.0 Pts

Superficial or partial response

0.0 Pts

No response or response did not address question

0.0 Pts

No marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion

A10: What does the field of psychology offer concerning the self-fulfilling prophecy?

4.0 Pts

Full marks

Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources

3.0 Pts

Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources

2.0 Pts

Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question

1.0 Pts

Superficial or partial response

0.0 Pts

No response or response did not address question

0.0 Pts

No marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion

A11: How does the process of perception limit our view, or expand it? Can we choose how to perceive things?

4.0 Pts

Full marks

Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources

3.0 Pts

Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources

2.0 Pts

Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question

1.0 Pts

Superficial or partial response

0.0 Pts

No response or response did not address question

0.0 Pts

No marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion

A15: How does the intended audience influence the choice of words and use of language in a document? Think of a specific topic and two specific kinds of audiences. Then write a short example of how this topic might be presented to each of the two audiences.

4.0 Pts

Full marks

Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources

3.0 Pts

Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources

2.0 Pts

Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question

1.0 Pts

Superficial or partial response

0.0 Pts

No response or response did not address question

0.0 Pts

No marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion

A16: Create a sales letter for an audience that comes from a culture other than your own. Identify the culture and articulate how your message is tailored to your perception of your intended audience.

4.0 Pts

Full marks

Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources

3.0 Pts

Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources

2.0 Pts

Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question

1.0 Pts

Superficial or partial response

0.0 Pts

No response or response did not address question

0.0 Pts

No marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion

A21: Is it important to consider the rhetorical situation? Provide a justification for your view.

4.0 Pts

Full marks

Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources

3.0 Pts

Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources

2.0 Pts

Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question

1.0 Pts

Superficial or partial response

0.0 Pts

No response or response did not address question

0.0 Pts

No marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeDescription of criterion

A23: Does organising a presentation involve ethics? Explain your response.

4.0 Pts

Full marks

Excellent response that draws on external evidence and other high quality sources

3.0 Pts

Good response but may (or may not) lack external evidence or other high quality sources

2.0 Pts

Complete response that adequately addresses all aspects of the question

1.0 Pts

Superficial or partial response

0.0 Pts

No response or response did not address question

0.0 Pts

No marks

4.0 pts

Total points: 40.0


Price: £ 89

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions