We write, we don’t plagiarise! Every answer is different no matter how many orders we get for the same assignment. Your answer will be 100% plagiarism-free, custom written, unique and different from every other student.
I agree to receive phone calls from you at night in case of emergency
Please share your assignment brief and supporting material (if any) via email here at: [email protected] after completing this order process.
No Plagiarism Guarantee - 100% Custom Written
Assignment Brief
Unit title
U502 Management System Models
Unit learning outcomes
Word limit
Max 4500 words
Education centre name
Education centre code
Assignment submission deadline
Assignment background
As a newly appointed Quality Manager, you have been asked to advise top management on the possible application and relative benefits of three management system models, namely: ISO 9001, EFQM Model and Investors in People (IIP).
You are also required to explain the potential advantages and opportunities the models can provide for your organisation in achieving integration with other management systems (such as environment or health and safety).
Task
The following tasks form the basis of the assignment:
Guidance notes
There is a wealth of information documented about each of these models so try to get a balanced view, especially when comparing the various types of model.
Focus on the organisation you work for or another of your acquaintance to provide practical examples to support your assignment.
Write the assignment as a guidance document for top management unfamiliar with the management system models.
Assignment marking sheet
Unit title: U502 Management System Models
Centre code:
CQI Student number ______________ Date of submission
% Mark available
Tutor’s
mark
Examiner’s mark
Executive summary
5
Introduction to organisation and to management system models in general
15
Similarities and differences between ISO 9001, EFQM Model and IIP
Application of the models to the organisation
The use of the models in supporting the implementation of an integrated management system
The application of internal and external assessment techniques to monitor effectiveness of implementation of an integrated management system
Conclusions
10
Recommendations
Presentation (layout, spelling, grammar)
- no marks allocated, marks can only be deducted
Up to - 5
Referencing (correct use of the Harvard referencing system) - no marks allocated, marks can only be deducted
Overall mark
100
Tutor’s further comments for the CQI moderator:
Tutor’s signature __________________________ Date ______________________
Grading Criteria
Distinction
D
80+
Work of a distinguished quality that demonstrates a detailed knowledge base and awareness of the wider implications. The work will clearly show the ability to analyse, synthesise, evaluate and interpret concepts, principles and data. There will be strong evidence of competence across a range of specialised skills, using them to plan, develop and evaluate problem solving strategies.
Merit
M
65 – 79
Work of a very good quality that demonstrates a high degree of ability in subject areas/key skills. Evidence of strong analysis, synthesis, evaluation and the ability to develop judgements. The work should be able to show consistent evidence of capability, including self-evaluation and the ability to effectively use a range of techniques in various situations.
Pass
P
50 – 64
Work of satisfactory quality that demonstrates a good knowledge of theories and provides some evidence of analysis and evaluation. The work may be rather standard, limited, but will be mostly accurate. There may be some errors and omissions.
Fail
F
0 - 49
Work that is well below the standard in relation to one or more subject based or key skills area. It may address to some extent some of the subject matter, but such factors are outweighed by major deficiencies across remaining areas.
