We're Open
+44 7340 9595 39
+44 20 3239 6980

[Solved] DRAW STAKEHOLDER ROLE NAMES ON A STAKEHOLDER MAP

  100% Pass and No Plagiarism Guaranteed

[Solved] DRAW STAKEHOLDER ROLE NAMES ON A STAKEHOLDER MAP

In this paper, you are supposed to draw stakeholder role names with 4 quadrants such as Internal Operation, Internal Executive, External Operational, and External Executive. Also, describe the interest of each stakeholder in the project. Moreover, you are required to create questionnaire that you would send to stakeholder group to help you spot details about the environment, the problem area and how to solve those problems. Finally, you must use case diagram and description.  

Task

Background

Refer to background information provided in Assessment 1 regarding the Commonwealth Government ‘My Health Record’ project.

Complete the Following

Please refer to the marking guide when preparing your response to see what criteria and standards will be used to assess your work and your progress.

Consider that funding has been approved for a project to build a system that will capture the ‘story’ the first time it is told, and give access to successive professionals, so that case notes and the story can become enriched, and the young person can be assisted more appropriately. You are the business systems analyst assigned to the project, you will need to produce:

Stakeholder map

  • Draw stakeholder role names on a stakeholder map with 4 quadrants, Internal-Operation, Internal-Executive, External-Operation, External-Executive
  • For each stakeholder, describe why they have an interest in the project.

 

Questionnaire

Create one questionnaire that you would send to one stakeholder group with an aim to help you identify further details about the environment, the problem area and/or how the system would operate to help solve the problem.

  • Identify which stakeholder you are going to send the questionnaire to
  • Write an introduction statement that would go with the questionnaire explaining the purpose of the questionnaire
  • Write 10 questions, either open and/or closed ended questions
  • This should be written as a questionnaire that could be distributed
  • Only write the questions, you should not write the answers

 

Use Case diagram and descriptions

  • Draw a use case model for the information system
  • Write brief Use Case description for each Use Case in the diagram
  • Write onefully developed Use Case description for one of the important Use Cases identified. Select an important Use Case that is key part of the system, not a basic simple Use Case.

Rationale

This assessment has been designed to allow students to test and demonstrate their topic understanding related to:

  • apply stakeholder analysis for of an information system;
  • describe and apply requirements gathering techniques;
  • define functional requirements

Marking criteria

Criteria

High Distinction (HD)

Distinction (DI)

Credit (CR)

Pass (PS)

Fail (FL)

1.Stakeholder map

 

Maximum 5 Marks

Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.

Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Clearly shows Stakeholder map.

Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Shows Stakeholders.

Demonstrates understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Lists Stakeholders.

Has not demonstrated understanding of material presented in core texts and readings. Stakeholders not listed or inappropriate.

2.Questionnaire

 

Maximum 5 Marks

10 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights to and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read beyond the core material.

7 or more questions are stated that demonstrates breadth of understanding and has insights to aspects of the topic. Evidence of having read the core material.

5 or more questions are stated that demonstrates understanding. Evidence of having read the core material.

3 or less questions stated, little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Basic knowledge of key principles and concepts.

1 or less questions stated, very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.

3.Functional Requirements

 

Maximum 16 Marks

 Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having researched/read more widely beyond the core materials.

 Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates breadth and depth of understanding and has insights and awareness of many of the deeper more subtle aspects of the topic content. Evidence of having read beyond the core materials.

 Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates thorough understanding of material presented in core texts and readings.

 Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. However literature is presented uncritically in a purely descriptive manner. Content acknowledged but not really taken into account.

 Use Case Model and descriptions, including a critical core use case. Demonstrates very little evidence of having read material presented in core texts and readings. Inaccurate or inconsistent acknowledgment of sources.
Limited knowledge of key principles and concepts.

4.Presentation, writing style, grammer and references

 

Maximum 4 Marks

Highly developed skills in expression and presentation of response.
Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.
Grammar and spelling accurate. Well-organised.

Well-developed skills in expression and presentation of response.
Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.
Grammar and spelling accurate.

Good skills in expression and clear presentation of response.
Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task.
Grammar and spelling accurate.

Some skills in expression and presentation of response.
Meaning apparent but writing style not always fluent or well organised.
Grammar and spelling contain errors.

Rudimentary skills in expression and presentation of response.
Not all material is relevant and/or is presented in a disorganised manner.
Meaning apparent but writing style not fluent or well-organised,
Grammar and spelling contain errors.

 

 


100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written,
Tailored to your instructions


International House, 12 Constance Street, London, United Kingdom,
E16 2DQ

UK Registered Company # 11483120


100% Pass Guarantee

STILL NOT CONVINCED?

View our samples written by our professional writers to let you comprehend how your work is going to look like. We have categorised this into 3 categories with a few different subject domains

View Our Samples

We offer a £ 2999

If your assignment is plagiarised, we will give you £ 2999 in compensation

Recent Updates

Details

  • Title: [Solved] DRAW STAKEHOLDER ROLE NAMES ON A STAKEHOLDER MAP
  • Price: £ 99
  • Post Date: 2021-10-25T04:43:19+00:00
  • Category: Assignment Queries
  • No Plagiarism Guarantee
  • 100% Custom Written

Customer Reviews

[Solved] DRAW STAKEHOLDER ROLE NAMES ON A STAKEHOLDER MAP [Solved] DRAW STAKEHOLDER ROLE NAMES ON A STAKEHOLDER MAP
Reviews: 5

A masterpiece of assignment by , written on 2020-03-12

My psychology assignment just came on time and the overall quality is good. It’s also free from errors. I simply loved it!
Reviews: 5

A masterpiece of assignment by , written on 2020-03-12

My order went 3 hours late and I also went mad. Then the customer support team calmed me down and offered me a flat discount of 50%. However, I did get my order and chilled out as the work was exactly what I requested. Next time I would place my order a bit sooner to save any trouble.