Classical Ethical Theory
(Value 60%)
|
Demonstrates an excellent ability at applying ethical theories to the ethical issues.
|
Demonstrates a good ability at applying ethical theories to the ethical issues.
|
Makes a genuine attempt at applying the ethical theories to the ethical issues.
|
The ethical theories do not link well with the ethical issues.
|
The ethical theories are not properly applied to the ethical issues.
|
Writing & structure
(Value 20%)
|
Language features and structures are used to convey meaning effectively, concisely, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose with no spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors.
|
Well developed skills in expression & presentation of ideas.
Fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.
Grammar & spelling accurate.
|
Good skills in expression & clear presentation of ideas.
Mostly fluent writing style appropriate to assessment task/document type.
Grammar & spelling contains a few minor errors.
|
The text contains frequent errors in spelling, grammar, word choice, and structure, lacks clarity, and is not concise, but the meaning is apparent to the reader with some effort.
|
Rudimentary skills in expression & presentation of ideas. Not all material is relevant &/or is presented in a disorganised manner. Meaning apparent, but writing style not fluent or well organised.
Grammar & spelling contains many errors.
|
Conclusion
(Value 10%)
|
Superior conclusion that ties the results of the analysis together into a coherent, logically valid & convincing argument.
|
Very high standard conclusion that ties the results of the analysis together into a coherent, logically valid & convincing argument.
|
High standard conclusion that ties the results of the analysis together into a coherent, logically valid & convincing argument.
|
Rudimentary conclusion that provides a convincing argument.
|
Sub-standard (or no) conclusion.
|
Referencing
(Value 10%)
|
Referencing is comprehensive, demonstrates academic integrity, and conforms exactly to APA style conventions.
|
Very good referencing, including reference list and citations.
Evidence of high quality references.
|
Good referencing, including reference list and citations.
Evidence of good quality references.
|
Referencing is comprehensive, mostly accurate according to APA style conventions, and demonstrates academic integrity. Some minor errors or omissions in style and formatting choices (e.g. italics, punctuation, etc) don’t impact on the transparency and traceability of the source, or demonstration of academic integrity.
|
Sub-standard (or no) referencing. Poor quality (or no) references.
|